Rather than go off in somebody else's thread, I'm making a new one.
I often run into the mindset that equates the understanding of why somebody does something - anything - with excusing that behavior. As if to say that if we, as a jury or just as human beings, understand the train of incidents and/or genetics and/or whatever else that led to an instance of wrongdoing, then we are bound to just pat them on the head and let them go on their merry way.
I don't get that at all. I really don't understand why those two are connected. They aren't connected at all for me - I can understand what led someone to do a heinous crime without letting them off the hook for responsibility for their actions.
Can somebody explain that linkage to me? Why does understanding equal excusing?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.